Final Project – Luci Laffitte – Intersecta: Pollination Wall

by luci @ 2:26 am 10 May 2012

Intersecta is an experimental exhibit, currently being developed for the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, which explores the connection between insects and people. The project uses Kinect technology to allow visitors to discover what insects do for us — by highlighting the human foods for which insects are crucial pollinators.



Intersecta is an experimental exhibit being developed for the Carnegie Museum of Natural History that explores the connection between insects and people (as part of my senior design capstone course). The exhibit will use kinect technology to allow large white walls to be interactive. For my project I am prototyping the Pollination wall. This piece of the exhibit allows visitors to explore what insects do for us by showing which foods that we eat insects are crucial to pollinating. An interactive gigapan image will show the different aspects of an insects’ anatomy that contribution to it’s role as a pollinator. In the second section, lights will illuminate which the fruits and veggies the insect pollinates. In the final section, visitors will see recipes made from the foods that the insect makes possible, and save specific ones to their bug block.


I wanted to do this project so I could display an example of the work my design teammates and I conducted over the course of the semester and prove that the technology is possible and affordable.


I struggled with deciding on my exact set-up for this project because our design in full-scale calls for a 5’x12′ wall with an advanced short throw projector. However using the one kinect I had access to did not allow me to sense users across the entire length of the wall. That being said, I decided that I would try a slightly scaled down version of the wall (about 7 feet long) with the kinect at different angles to try to get the best touch detection. I tried positioning the kinect above, to the side, and from behind. After several days of experimenting, and considering that my ultimate goal was the present this in a large open room at the museum, I settled on setting up the kinect from behind.


From there I used synapse for kinect and Dan Wilcox’s git hub example to track the skeleton of a user. By defining where hotspots are located on the board, and entering into the program the location of the four corners of the wall according to the kinect, I was able to reliably allow a user to interact with an interface.

The Interface:

The Setup

Images of User Interaction:

This image shows a friend interacting with the program with the Kinect from behind and a low-quality projector from behind. This is why part of the interface is projected on his hand. The green circle shows where the system thinks his hand is! Wooo!

Alex Wolfe + Mahvish Nagda | Waterbomb

by a.wolfe @ 4:11 pm 9 May 2012

For our final project, we completed a series of studies experimenting with soft origami in the context of creating a wearable. Kinetic wearables are often bulky, with incredibly complex mechanical systems driving them. We wanted to create a simpler lightweight system without sacrificing the drama of global movement, by capitalizing  on the innate transformative qualities of origami.

We developed several methods of creating tessellations that cut normal folding time in half, and were simple to create in bulk and at a huge scale. These included scoring with a laser cutter, creating stencils to use the fabric itself as a flexible hinge, and heat setting synthetics between origami molds. We also examined the folds themselves, writing scripts in Processing to generate crease patterns that either focused on kinetic properties or being able to control the curve and shape of the final form.

These studies culminated in a dress that took advantage of the innate kinetic properties of the waterbomb fold to display global movement over the entire skirt structure with a relatively lightweight mechanical system. The dress moves in tandem with a breath sensor, mimicking the expanding/contracting movements of the wearer.

Inspiration + Background

(images from left to right: Tai + Nussey’s Pen Nib Dress, Intimacy 2.0 by studio roosegaardeOrigami Hemisphere by tactom)

When we began this project, Mahvish and I were really interested on how we could get a garment to move in an interesting way. Most electronic wearables focus on lighting up using LEDs (since they don’t require much power and it is an instantaneous noticeable effect) and we really wanted to move away from that. As two women who like dressing up a lot, there were not many scenarios where we would want to be blinking or emitting light (several amazing jackets for cycling/safety, and those sneakers that light up when you walk aside). However, kinetic pieces with really impressive/dramatic movement, like the Pen Nib Dress above, require equally impressive electrical systems underneath to make it move that really discourages daily wear. Magnificently engineered ones that don’t, like the Intimacy collections, relied on custom e-foils that were inaccessible and out of our price range.

We wanted to create our own fabric, similar to the efoils, that had some sort of innate property that would allow us the global movement we desired, without having to connect an individual motor to each moving element. Our shared interest/past experience with origami stared us down the ridiculously long and meandering path documented below.



Really the key to beautiful origami is precision, one thing computers are great at, and humans are not. For our initial explorations we created by perforating the crease patterns into various materials, eliminating the hours of pre-folding usually needed to create these tessellations. Initially we split each design in two, and etched one side of the material where we wanted mountain folds, and the other with valleys. However, despite much time wasted fiddling with settings, the etchings proved to be either not deep enough to be useful, or cut all the way through the material. It turned out to be much easier to have perforated vectors that could be folded into mountains or valleys. Using Processing scripts (and ToxicLibs libraries), we then generated known folding patterns, focusing on those with interesting kinetic properties. Once we had the scripts written, it was easy to tweak the angles and intersections of the patterns in order to produce different overall curvatures and behaviors.

screens from our generative miura ori code. We generated the pattern based on the points in a user controlled spline to control curvature in the final piece. We can also add noise to the patterns and export .dxf files for prototyping in Tactom‘s freeform origami simulator

Heat Setting

One of the most interesting curvatures we found was the Origami Hyperbolic Parabola. As you tween between an equilaterial  triangle and a square, the simple pattern transitions from being completely flat to a perfect parabolic curve. We decided to use it as a base for our studies in heat setting.

While researching various shibori techniques, we discovered that synthetic fabrics can be melted and then quickly cooled in order to retain very complex shapes relatively robustly. We placed synthetic organza between two parabola moulds and heated it. We explored steaming and baking the moulds.

We steamed for 15 minutes. We found that steaming deteriorated the moulds and the final creasing wasn’t as strong.

Baking was much more effective but needed at least 30 minutes at 170 degrees. However, the folds were quite durable and could withstand any pulling/tugging and even washing we threw at it. We also used thicker paper for the moulds with tighter creasing.


Earlier in the process, we had planned to actuate the dress with nitinol, and decided to use thermochromatic dye for our fabric which would react to the heat it generates. However, nitinol was far too weak to create the movement we wanted, though the dye worked surprisingly well as a stiffening agent.

By stenciling in the dye into the non-crease areas and leaving the creases un-dyed, we were able to effectively pre-crease the fabric, and create bi-directional folds that didn’t need to be refolden/broken in. We used the generated crease patterns to laser cut stencils, and used them to silk screen the pattern onto muslin fabric. The parts that were un-dyed were more pliable and because of this combined with the fabric being more accommodating than paper, we were able to cut down the folding time to about half an hour (from 3 hours). We started with a smaller prototype  waterbomb tesselation and then made a skirt using a larger crease pattern. Because stencils that we got from the laser cutter can only be so wide, we silk screened smaller sections and then stitched them together. To strengthen the folds, we ironed the creases. We also found that stiffener (Stiffen Spray) was inflammable and ironing it on made the creases stronger post folding.

Mechanical System

Once we had the waterbomb fabric, we looked at different mechanical systems that we could use to actuate it. We finally decided on monofilament truss system that we threaded through eyelets that we laser cut and hand sewed onto the vertices of the waterbomb valleys. We used these to control the movement we wanted from the dress via 3 cords made up smaller connections from the wiring in the dress. One string controlled the front vertical movement of the dress, the other the back vertical movement and the last one controlled constricting horizontal movement.

Electrical System

Mahvish and I are both software kind of girls with experience in small scale robotics, so we were super excited to jump in and …learn some basic electrical engineering. We designed the system to be relatively straightforward with that in mind. We anchored most of the heavier elements to the incredibly sturdy zipper of the dress so we wouldn’t need crazy boning/corsetry to hold it up.

One of the most exciting elements of this project for us (and ultimately, the key to our doom), was the fact that we built the key elements of the electrical system ourselves. We hacked some basic hobby servos Mahvish had for continuous rotation by removing the pentometer and replacing it with two 2.2kohm resistors. We also built a voltage regulator so we could power our initial design, which required 5 normal servos, off of a single 9volt that we ended up scrapping, but were immensely proud of. Lastly the breath sensor built into the collar took advantage of the thermochromatic paint. When the wearer breathes on it, the paint changes color which is picked up by a light sensor and sent to the Lilypad.

(parts from top left clockwise: diy continuous rotation servo with bobbin, battery packs x2, diy voltage regulator, breadboard prototype for the breath sensor, slightly more buff diy continuous rotation servo hot glued to laser cut mount)

Kinetic Waterbomb Dress


SeaLegs: A Squid-Based Modeler for Digital Fabrication – Madeline Gannon

by madeline @ 2:36 pm 1 May 2012

SeaLegs, a responsive environment for “Mollusk-Aided Design”, harnesses the power of simulated virtual squids to generate baroque and expressive spatial forms. Specifically, the project uses “chronomorphology” — a 3D analog to chronophotography — to develop complex composite forms from the movements of synthetic creatures.

[vimeo 42085064 width=”620″ height=”350″]

Within the simulated environment the creature can be manipulated for formal, spatial, and gestural variation (below left). Internal parameters (the number of legs and joints per leg) combine with external parameters (such as drag and repulsion forces) to create a high level of control over the creature’s responsiveness and movement through the virtual space. As the creature’s movements are traced through space and time, its familiar squid-like motion aggregates into unexpected, intricate forms (below right). The resulting forms are immediately ready for fabrication, and can be exported to high resolution 3D printers (bottom).


Physical Artifacts Generated:

Additional Digital Artifacts:


*made in java with the help of Processing, Toxiclibs, PeasyCam, and ControlP5

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
(c) 2024 Interactive Art and Computational Design, Spring 2012 | powered by WordPress with Barecity